Link: In Conversation with Happily Ever After by Catherine M. Roach (2016)

The Smut Report has a fascinating review of Happily ever afterHappily Ever After by Catherine M. Roach, an analysis of Romance through a feminist, modern lens.

The Smut Report

I’ve decided that in order to deal with my mixed emotions about not being part of Academic Romacelandia (a combination of regret, pining, and acknowledgment that I don’t really like doing research), I’m going to try and at least read academic monographs about romance. And then write about them.

Happily Ever After: The Romance Story in Popular Culture spoke to me as someone who is kind of between worlds. Or, rather, as someone who is familiar with both Academia and Romancelandia, even if I have imposter syndrome when dealing with both of them. (Self-analysis for another time.) Roach set out to explore romance fiction – and as part of her project, acted as a participant-observer. Not just as a fan, but also as an author. (Fun fact! Her first book, a historical romance called Master of Love, culminates with the heroine pegging the hero.) So her book is…

View original post 813 more words

Author: Jacqueline Diaz

I’m an author of two historical romance works-in-progress,"The Savage Noble" and "What She Says With Her Eyes," which will both be released in 2022. A proud college dropout, Libra, INFP, Long Islander, wife, and mother of one, I’ve spent the past two decades working from home and homeschooling our–-now-adult–-child. Along the way, we’ve collected a clowder of cats and been blessed to love several dogs, rabbits, chickens, turtles, frogs, guinea pigs, and more. Married for 22 years and counting to my college sweetheart, I’d consider myself to be a mix between traditional and Bohemian and thus have a unique perspective to offer when it comes to writing romance.

One thought on “Link: In Conversation with Happily Ever After by Catherine M. Roach (2016)”

  1. This is a fascinating article. I too, feel as if I am stuck between two schools of thought/sympathies/ideologies about romance and literary critcisim. I find the current defensive attitude towards it by it’s defenders – ie, Pamela Regis – off putting, but I don’t find the dismissive attitude by many male critics towards romantic love and love stories generally any more congenial. I write stories myself which are to some extent like historial romance spoofs, so I’m interested in your approach.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Lucinda Elliot Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: